INTERSTELLAR LIGHTHOUSES
| ONWARD TOWARD DESTINATION STAR | ||
| Destination star makes a magnificent homing beacon. Since vessel can always see its destination, it should stay on course throughout the multi-year voyage.
However, vessels needs to track both duration and distance to properly monitor progress.
COMPELLING REASON:
Vessel must start 1-G deceleration at precise distance from destination.
|
S-1: FIRST WISE MAN, HEINRICH OLBERS
 In the 1830's, German astronomer, Heinrich Olbers, reasoned the universe must be finite, because an infinity of stars would illuminate Earth’s night-side (facing away from Sol) as brightly as the Earth’s day-side. Infinite stars would ensure a continual source of light to every spot on Earth. Of course, we do experience night time darkness due to the daily cycle; so, the quantity of stars is finite, and the Universe has limits. (See Olbers's Paradox.)Not only is the star quantity (perhaps 1022) finite, but they are mostly "bunched up" into many galaxies, a much lesser number (perhaps 1011); at best, human eye perceives most galaxies as a point of light. Also, given that "brightness" decreases as the square of the distance from the light source, no wonder that our "night time" is much darker than day time illuminated by our nearby sun.
| |
| INTERSTELLAR ACCELERATION DURING FIRST LIGHT YEAR (LY) | ||
 |
ACCELERATION TIME. TE assumes vessel’s high performance particle accelerators can g-force accelerate vessel for one year duration. Thus, vessel starts voyage with one year of g-force propulsion to attain cruise velocity of .644 light speed (c) and distance of .377 LY.
CRUISE TIME. Earth observes cruise time during first LY as follows: tCru = .623 LY / .644 c = .97 year TOTAL TIME FOR FIRST LY. Earth observer measures first light year's total travel time as sum of acceleration time plus cruise time. TLY1 = 1.0 year + .97 year = 1.97 year | |
| INTERSTELLAR CRUISE DURING SEVERAL LIGHT YEARS | ||
CONSTANT CRUISE VELOCITY Earth observer measures Total Travel Time for a typical LY as result of 1 Light Year divided by cruise velocity.TCru = 1.0 LY / .644 c = 1.55 year SIMULATED GRAVITY DURING CRUISE To conserve fuel, the vessel must cruise with no propulsion. Thus, the vessel must simulate Earth gravity via centrifugal force (spin about longitudinal axis). |  | |
| INTERSTELLAR DECELERATION DURING LAST LIGHT YEAR (LY) | ||
 | DECELERATION: Assume it's axiomatic that G-force vessel will need same duration and distance to slow from cruise velocity (.644c) as was required to accelerate. TLY1 = tCru + tDec = TLast TLast = .97 year + 1.0 year = 1.97 year | |
| PROBLEMATIC COMMUNICATION DELAYS. | ||
 In the 1930's, Georges Lemaitre, a Catholic priest, proposed the Big Bang theory of creation. Einstein, himself, applauded this theory.
Of course, modern science accepts the "Big Bang" theory of creation which would put the age of the Universe at 13.2 billion years (give or take), and the diameter of a spherical Universe could be about 26.4 billion light years (assuming expansion from some "central point" at light speed). |
Earth observed duration/distances will greatly interest Earth occupants, but they will be of little use to the vessel. At light speed (c), optical photons and/or communication electrons will take years to travel between Earth and vessel (assume vessel velocity = .6443c).
HUGE INTERSTELLAR DISTANCES introduce problematic communication delays. EXAMPLE: Let ship be at position A, 3 LYs from Earth. Thus, vessel's status report takes 3 years to reach Earth.
1) During that 3 years, Earth observes ship's travel at another 1.93 LY (= .6443c × 3yr).
2) Earth's immediate response will take another 3 years to reach Position A, and ship travels yet another 1.93 LY.
3) Such delays will cause vessel to reach destination well before receiving most Earth based replies; thus, vessel autonomy is inevitable.
| |
| SHIP BASED AUTONOMY | ||
|
... is critical for voyages to other stars.
1) Interstellar distances prevent timely guidance from Earth based facilities.
2) Vessel's high cruise speed (perhaps .6443c) relativistically shrinks time; thus, navigator must use ship based observations.
3) An accurate chronometer is essential to track vessel's progress.Current technology, cesium clock, can accurately track time to greater than one part per trillion (1012). With precisely measured vessel velocity, accurate Dead Reckoning (DR) should stand them in good stead, assuming empty space (pure vacuum) throughout their voyage. However, a prudent crew would still want to confirm DRs via other methods, such as: stellar luminosity, communication capsules, and bearings to nearby stars. |
Renowned astro-physicist, Stephen Hawking, may have browsed that black holes (i.e., singularities) likely exist throughout space (perhaps one singularity per cubic light year). If so, what are the chances of a singularity being near the course line of an interstellar voyage?
Thus, constant attention to the stellar destination is very important. If a singularity resides on that route of flight, destination star light should show some anomalies. | |
 For given aperture, extend exposure
duration until CCD collects 100,000 photons from home star, Sol. For subsequent measurements use same aperture and exposure time to properly compare quantity of photons collected. Since vessel is traveling away from Sol,
expect photons to decrease parabolically as shown in table. |
 For given aperture, extend exposure
duration until CCD collects 1,000 photons from Groombridge 34. For subsequent measurements use same aperture and exposure time to properly compare quantity of photons collected. Since vessel travels toward G34, expect
photons to increase parabolically as shown in table. |
| STELLAR LUMINOSITY | |
|---|---|
Historically, astronomy has used Standard Candles to estimate distance based on brightness. Almost all astronomical objects used as physical distance indicators have a known brightness. By comparing this known luminosity to an object's observed brightness, the distance to the object can be computed using the inverse square law.
Now, in the digital age, modern astronomy uses CCDs to accurately count photons; thus, brightness is now a very objective measurement. Thus, a vessel's fore mounted CCD can precisely measure continuous increase of photons from destination; in like manner, an aft mounted device can determine a series of decreasing photon quantities. |
EXAMPLE: Let this vessel do both baseline measurements at exactly 1 LY from Sol. 1) As vessel goes further from Sol, a precise photon count should verify a parabolic decrease in quantity of collected photons emitted from Sol. 2) As vessel nears destination star, note a parabolic increase of photons from that star. |
An occultation occurs when a nearby object totally or partially blocks the view of an observed star (i.e. eclipse). During an interstellar voyage, a rogue planet or a brown dwarf could conceivably cross the course line to temporarily occult the view of the destination star. |
 A transit occurs when a smaller body passes in front of a larger one. Throughout most of an interstellar voyage, detecting transits seem very unlikely. |
 Light curve below the diagram demonstrates the lower light levels during the transit.
Light would likely decrease less than 1%; HOWEVER, CCDs count individual photons and have readily detected such variations since the 1980’s. This seems to be the most likely cause of decreased brightness anomalies throughout most of an interstellar voyage. |
 For interstellar vessels, flares will slightly increase photon counts by CCD monitors. A stellar flare is a rapid, intense increase in brightness due to routine, anomalous magnetic energy release in the stellar atmosphere. Associated radiation emits across the entire electromagnetic spectrum. While emitted energy quantity is massive (typically 1020 ergs, equals a billion tons of TNT), it is relatively modest compared to star’s total energy; thus, observed star shows a slight increase in brightness. Flares are sometimes accompanied by a coronal mass ejection. | A Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) is a giant cloud of charged particles (plasma) erupting out of a star during a series of strong, long-duration stellar flares. Figure’s coronagraph displays the corona by covering Sol with a small disk (much like an eclipse). CMEs cause strong geomagnetic storms as well as enhanced stellar brightness due to associated stellar flares; however, CME contains mostly slow plasma particles. CMEs funnel plasma particles to random nearby locations; thus, associated magnetic changes can degrade many technologies on a interstellar vessel in star's vicinity.  |  Binary stars (two orbiting stars) are very common. Certain binary stars increase brightness from a distinct minima when smaller star hides behind its larger companion. This “eclipsing binary” has its orbital plane in the observer’s line of sight. Thus, these companions undergo mutual eclipses with periodic variations in brightness. A lesser minima happens when the smaller star passes in front of the larger; this annular eclipse is shown above. Algol is currently the best-known eclipsing binary. Binary should not be confused with an optical double star; two stars seen as close from the Earth's line of sight. However, "double" stars share no physical connection. |
| COMMUNICATION CAPSULES | |
 |
For certain stellar routes, comm capsules might deploy to facilitate communications for vessels between the two stars. These comm capsules could also function as way-stations at fairly static locations; perhaps at 1 Light Year (LY) distance intervals. Such way-stations could provide good distance indications to vessels cruising at constant velocity. |
| INTERSTELLAR BEARINGS | |
|
Nearby stars also provide useful BEARINGS to precisely track progress to our destination. Navigators can use bearings to determine Lines of Position (LOPs) during interstellar voyages. When multiple LOPs cross course line at same position at same time, navigator gains a successful "fix" to greatly increases his confidence in ship's position. During cruise (constant velocity portion of voyage), multiple fixes help the navigator accurately predict future positions. |
 |
| DETECTION METHODS include following two methods: 1) Direct imaging enables continuous observation of discovered rogue planets. Unfortunately, only young, massive rogue planets emit enough radiation to be discovered. On the plus side, out of the glare of a host star, a discovered rogue planet can be easily observed. 2) Microlensing. When a planetary-mass object passes in front of a star, object's gravitational field momentarily increases visible brightness of background star. This microlensing effect is fleeting, because rogue planet moves relative to background star. HOWEVER, microlensing can detect much lower-mass planets than direct imaging method. |
are substellar objects with mass greater than the heaviest gas giant planets and less than the smallest stars (red dwarfs); typical mass is between 10 to 100 Jupiter masses (MJ). Some brown dwarfs even have planets. History: Brown dwarf (Teide 1) was first discovered by Spanish astrophysicists in 1994. Since then, over 1,800 brown dwarfs have been identified. Discovery Methods: Brown dwarfs are very faint at visible wavelengths; however, sensitive telescopes with charge-coupled devices (CCDs) can search distant star clusters for faint objects, such as Teide 1. Wide-field searches often identify individual faint objects, such as Kelu-1 (30 LYs away). Brown dwarfs are often discovered in surveys of extrasolar planets; it turns out these methods of detecting extrasolar planets work even better for brown dwarfs. |
 |
 |
c) BLACK HOLE
Due to conservation of angular momentum,
gas going into a black hole will typically form a disc-like structure (i.e. "accretion disk") around
the event horizon.
Gravitational Lensing. Due to black hole’s strong gravity field, gravitational lensing deflects light rays; this is similar to light passing through an optical lens. While strong gravitational lensing bends images completely around the accretion disk, weak gravitational lensing deflects light rays by only a few arc seconds. HOWEVER, weak lensing has not yet been directly observed for a black hole. |
...is a hypothetical singularity without an event horizon. 2) Gravitational lensing would distort the view. If the view remains undisturbed, assume the singularity is not near. To confirm progress along course line, interstellar vessel & crew constantly monitor nearby destination and stars for LOPs; recorded images might show signs of above. |
 TYPICAL BLACK HOLE displays an obvious accretion diskoutside the event horizon. A naked singularity without this disk would be harder to detect. |
 Brief History of Nemesis
Star Perturbations and Nemesis Theory .....physicist, Richard A. Muller, and others have postulated a stellar object, Nemesis, with a highly elliptical Solar orbit well beyond the Oort cloud. This object is theorized to pass through a portion of the Oort cloud about every 26 million years; thus, bombarding the inner.solar system with comets. Although the theory has many proponents, no direct proof of the existence of Nemesis has been found. |
e) NEARBY NEMESIS DEATH STAR THEORY refers to Earth's periodic mass extinctions which may be caused by a cloud of comets (from the Oort cloud) every 26 million years. Some people hypothesize a not yet discovered object (pre-named: Nemesis) such as a brown dwarf star or perhaps a black hole orbiting in the outer reaches of our solar system.Historical astronomers hypothesized on a very large object orbiting beyond Neptune based on observed perturbations of Neptune in its orbit. Searching for this object, Percival Lowell discovered, Pluto, now considered to be a large Kuiper Belt object, but certainly not large enough to have perturbed Neptune's orbit. Perhaps Nemesis caused these perturbations. Perhaps continuing perturbations might help us find Nemesis. Much effort has gone into searching for Nemesis, but of course there's a lot of sky to look at, and a dark object (very large planet, brown dwarf, black hole) would not reflect/radiate very much light to help us find it. It might be most likely detected by an occultation. For example if a well established star temporarily vanished, this would be a clue that Nemesis passed in front of it. Unfortunately, such a sighting might well be considered "noise" or another observational anomaly. Fortunately, interstellar vessels can easily deploy astronomical instruments to help both in finding Nemesis as well as avoiding enroute hazards. |
| DETECTION METHODS Constantly monitor nearby stars, blink comparator, transit, exoplanet detection, surprise light blockage, gravity lensing. | ||
|---|---|---|
| ...analyzes same celestial area imaged at different times. By rapidly "blinking" different time views, one readily detects an object change positions. "Nearby" objects such as asteroids and comets "jump" back and forth, while stars (more distant) stand still. In modern times, CCDs have largely replaced photographic plates with astronomical images stored digitally on computer clouds. Thus, the blink technique is better done via an automatic application versus painstaking proofing of a pair of photo prints.
Even better, image differencing algorithms more effectively detect moving objects and even measure the precise position of an object with known direction and rate of motion. |  Lowell Observatory's blink comparator at helped Clyde Tombaugh discover Pluto in 1930.
| |
 Fortunately, black hole’s immense gravity field deflects light rays from behind the black hole. Thus, a notional black hole exactly between a vessel and its destination star (EXAMPLE: Groombridge 34) could possibly result in gravity lensing such that G34 appears as four images (see artist concept at right).
Without gravity lensing, the black hole would likely be undetectable with much greater risk to interstellar travelers. Hopefully, enroute black holes will be very rare; however, they pose a significant theoretical risk to nearby interstellar travelers. If a space ship fails to avoid a block hole's event horizon, it faces certain destruction as it is completely consumed. Even if it avoids this fate and just passes near the singularity, the subsequent gravitational strain will likely damage vessel's structure. |  | |
| VOLUME 0: ELEVATIONAL |
|---|
| VOLUME I: ASTEROIDAL |
| VOLUME II: INTERPLANETARY |
| VOLUME III: INTERSTELLAR |
posted by JimODell at 2:17 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home