Introduce-Flight profile (transient)
Relativistic Mass Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apply Lorentz Transform to determine how much exhaust particle grows from original (ffsec). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Particle Size Maps to Particle Speed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We get a more pleasing picture if we list ffExh as integer multiples of ffsec. Thus, we restate relationship between exhaust particle's speed vs. mass. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Size & Speed to Ship Mass | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New ship size (Mship) column lists values as "mega-ffsec". Thus, if fuel flow values are in grams, then Mship would be metric Tonnes. Further, if ffsec values are in kilograms, then Mshipvalues would be in kilo metric Tonnes (kmT)... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Determine Daily Diff, Δ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The daily portion of ship's mass that must convert to kinetic energy is a very small percentage. Furthermore, this percentage gets even smaller as exhaust particle speed increases. |
| Departure Leg | Return Leg | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ffExh (multi-ffsec ) | Practical Range (RgePrac) | Phase I Time (tHalf) | Phase II Time | One Way Time (t1-way) | Phase III Time | Phase IV Time | Dest Dist. (d1-way) | |||
* ffsec | Days | Days | Days | Days | Days | Days | AU | |||
2 | 208 | 52 | 52 | 104 | 52 | 52 | 1,353 | |||
3 | 340 | 85 | 85 | 170 | 85 | 85 | 3,613 | |||
4 | 455 | 114 | 113 | 228 | 113 | 113 | 6,778 | |||
5 | 589 | 147 | 147 | 295 | 147 | 147 | 10,848 | |||
6 | 712 | 178 | 178 | 356 | 178 | 178 | 15,823 | |||
7 | 833 | 208 | 208 | 417 | 208 | 208 | 21,704 | |||
8 | 955 | 239 | 239 | 477 | 239 | 239 | 28,489 | |||
9 | 1,076 | 269 | 269 | 538 | 269 | 269 | 36,180 | |||
10 | 1,197 | 299 | 299 | 599 | 299 | 299 | 44,775 | |||
11 | 1,318 | 329 | 329 | 659 | 329 | 329 | 54,276 | |||
IV | DV | RgePrac/4 | RgePrac/4 | =tPh-I+tPh-II | RgePrac/4 | RgePrac/4 | g * t21-way |
| Departure Leg | Return Leg | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ffExh | Practical Range | Phase I | Phase II | One Way | Phase III | Phase IV | Two Way | ||||||||
n*ffsec | (RgePrac) | t | d | t | d | t1-way | d1-way | d | t | d | t | (t2-way) | |||
n | Days | Days | AUs | Days | AUs | Days | AUs | Days | AUs | Days | AUs | Days | AU | ||
2 | 208 | 52 | 676 | 52 | 676 | 104 | 1,353 | 52 | 676 | 52 | 676 | ||||
3 | 340 | 85 | 676 | 85 | 676 | 170 | 3,613 | 85 | 676 | 85 | 676 | ||||
4 | 455 | 113 | 676 | 113 | 676 | 226 | 6,778 | 113 | 676 | 113 | 676 | ||||
5 | 589 | 147 | 676 | 147 | 676 | 295 | 10,848 | 147 | 676 | 147 | 676 | ||||
6 | 712 | 178 | 676 | 178 | 676 | 356 | 15,823 | 178 | 676 | 178 | 676 | ||||
7 | 833 | 208 | 676 | 208 | 676 | 417 | 21,704 | 208 | 676 | 208 | 676 | ||||
8 | 955 | 239 | 676 | 239 | 676 | 477 | 28,489 | 239 | 676 | 239 | 676 | ||||
9 | 1,076 | 269 | 676 | 269 | 676 | 538 | 36,180 | 269 | 676 | 269 | 676 | ||||
10 | 1,197 | 299 | 676 | 299 | 676 | 599 | 44,775 | 299 | 676 | 299 | 676 | ||||
11 | 1,318 | 329 | 676 | 329 | 676 | 659 | 54,276 | 329 | 676 | 329 | 676 | ||||
IV | DV | RgePrac/4 | RgePrac/4 | =tPh-I+tPh-II |
Fuel per second | Ship propulsion | Per day | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original Mass | Exhaust Velocity | Exhaust Mass | Ship Velocity | Ship Mass | Daily %TOGW |
ffsec | vExh | ffExh | g | MShip | %TOGWDay |
kgm/sec | %c | kgm/sec | m/s2 | mT | % MShip |
0.48 | 86.6 | 0.96 | 10 | 25,000 | 0.17% |
0.96 | 86.6 | 1.92 | 10 | 50,000 | 0.17% |
1.73 | 86.6 | 2.88 | 10 | 75,000 | 0.17% |
1.92 | 86.6 | 3.84 | 10 | 100,000 | 0.17% |
ffExh | Given | MShip * %TOGWDay | Con. | Given | Given |
Since the Earth-like gravity condition requires extremely stable incremental velocity increase throughout the flight, any increased momentum from increased exhaust mass-velocity must go to increase amount of mass being propelled; this is size of spaceship, MShip(= ffExh* vExh / g).
Discussion when planning a mission, it's likely that planners will specify payload requirements or perhaps payload capacity and fuel flow will be adjusted to satisfy requirements. Thus, it makes sense to make table such that one can determine required fuel requirements to satisfy mission.
.
.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
.
.
.
.
.
Due to Lorentz Transform (LT), mass of exhaust particle (ffExh) is double that of original (ffsec) in this specific case when exhaust particle's speed is 86.6% light speed.
.
.
.
.
.
After one day of g-force acceleration, spacecraft achieves 864 km/sec.
Compute: vFinal = t * g ;
where t = time in seconds and
g = 10 meters/sec per sec = 10 m/sec2
vFinal = 86,400 secs * 10 m/s2 = 864,000 m/s = 864 km/sec
This is an extremely large value compared with velocity required to escape Earth's gravity, e = 11.5 km/sec. Of course, a vessel wishing to orbit Earth would have to decrease its velocity to less then e.
For above destinations, max velocity happens a midway between dept and dest. In a previous chapter, we have determined that two way travel time (go and return) for a flight profile where ship must accelerate to midway, then decelerate from midway to destination for one way. Thus max velocity is acheived at midway. To compute time to midway: tHalf = SQRT(d/g)
.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
.
.
.
.
1) | ffExh | = | ffsec |
---|---|---|---|
2) | ffsec | = | ffExh * SQRT(1-v2Exh/c2) |
3) | ffday | = | ffsec*86,400 sec/day |
4) | ffday | = | ffExh * SQRT(1-v2Exh/c2)*86,400 sec/day |
5) | %TOGWDay | = | ffday |
6) | %TOGWDay | = | ffExh * SQRT(1-v2Exh/c2)*86,400 sec/day |
7) | ffExh | = | g * MShip |
8) | %TOGWDay | = | g * MShip * SQRT(1-v2Exh/c2)*86,400 s/dy |
9) | %TOGWDay | = | g*SQRT(1 - v2Exh/c2)*86,400 s/dy |
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
PERSPECTIVE from bottom row of values: After we've expended 100% of the ship's mass, we accomplished following profile of go and return spaceflight.
PHASE-I. ACCELERATE TO HALFWAY. We have departed from vicinity of Earth and accelerated at g for half the one way distance (5,406 AUs = 10,812AUs/2). At this distance, constant g-force acceleration for 147 days causes our notional ship to attain 127,051 kms/sec which 42% light speed.
PHASE-II. DECELERATE TO DESTINATION. Our ship then decelerates for 147 days and another 5,406 AUs. Then, our velocity decreases to essentially zero, and we've completed the initial one way distance, 10,812 AUs. One LY = 63,115 AU; so, this takes us far less then 1/4 distance to Oort Cloud (appox 1 LY from Sol).
PHASE- III. ACCELERATE BACK TO HALFWAY. With 50% theoretical mass left, notional spaceship then reverses course for return trip and accelerates for 147 days and about 5,400 AUs toward Earth.
PHASE-IV. DECELERATE BACK TO START POINT. Finally, the spaceship decelerates for 147 days and remaining 5,406 AUs for a safe orbital velocity in Earth's vicinity.
1) BAD NEWS!! After we've accomplished the tremendous, remarkable feat of accelerating enormous amount of mass to 86.6% speed of light for a 2-way trip of almost 600 straight days, we've still barely moved out of the center of our Solar System.
1a) Even Badder News!!!! We can't use 100% of ship's mass as fuel. Let's arbitrarily pick a max of 50% as a reasonable limit for subsequent discussion.
2) GOOD NEWS!! Range of 50% TOGW is better then we might think. For example, if daily %TOGW is 1% and our ship weighs 100 tons, then first day, ship will consume 1 ton of fuel. A crude approx, 50 tons of fuel, thus, range is 50 days. However, range is really better then this.
The %TOGWDay is really only good for first day. After the first day, we must really use percent Gross Weight (%GW) because the GW decreases as the fuel is consumed.
2nd day of trip, GW = %TOGW - first day's fuel = 99 tons. 2nd day, ship consumes 1% of 99 tons which is slightly less then 1 ton,
3rd day, fuel consumption will be even less and so on as shown in following table.
Days | Assoc'd Calculation | Remaining | |
---|---|---|---|
0 | None | 100 mT | |
1 | 100mT * .99 | 99 mT | |
2 | 99 mT * .99 | 98.81 mT | |
3 | 100mT * .99 * .99 * .99 | 97.03 mT | |
4 | 100mT * .994 | 96.06 mT | |
5 | 100mT * .995 | 95.10 mT | |
... | ... ... ... ... ... | ... mT | |
n | 100mT * .99n | 100*.99n mT |
.9950 = .6050; too high.
.99100 = .3660; too low.
.9960 = .5472; too high.
.9970 = .4948; too low, but close.
.9969 = .4998; about right.
0.998350 | = | 0.9184 | |
0.9983100 | = | 0.8435 | |
0.9983200 | = | 0.7112 | |
0.9983400 | = | 0.5063 | |
.Similiar, exercise for fuel consumption rate of .17% /day which we calculate from an exhaust particle speed of .866c and we get table to right.
.
Perhaps a more convenient method might involve logarithms.
Recall log1010 = x
For example, log10100 = 2.
What if ax = b, where a and b are known, but x is unknown.
Due to exponent characteristics, x = log b / log a;
in our case, .9983x = .5000;
then x = log .5000 / log .9983 = 407.4.
Thus, exponentials and logarithms give a more accurate approximation of how many days 50% TOGW will take us if we're expending .17% GW per day.
EVEN BETTER NEWS!! It's very likely that we'll eventually design propulsion systems to accelerate particles much faster then .866c which means a much less fuel consumption rate and consequently much greater range.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home