Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Close Look at the Particle Stream

Carefully consider  quantities of water ions
required for an effective particle stream.
Readily transformed into steam, superheated steam and then plasma, water molecules will become the ions needed to enter the ship's particle accelerator (PA) to gain near light speed velocity then exit from the spacecraft. (TE assumes "equivalent water molecules": H2O broken into various ions, OH-, H- and O-.) Consequent momentum exchange imparts a slight velocity increase to the ship in the opposite direction.
To maintain g-force,
spaceships will need plenty of water.

Life support requirements of an ample water supply are obvious; however, an even more compelling requirement is to sustain g-force throughout the flight. Fortunately, there is plenty of water in Earth's oceans for the first few g-force ships. For longer term, there are plenty of water bearing comets throughout interplanetary space to provision the fleet of g-force ships needed to service likely travel requirements.

Previous work causes us to conclude that g-force spaceship's Gross Weight (GW) is everdecreasing due to fuel consumption. In turn, decreasing GW results in decreased fuel requirements; thus, each day's fuel burn will be slightly less then previous day.
As fuel burns, gross weight decreases.

As vessel weight decreases, burn rate also decreases.


To consider ion quantity requirements,
TE constructs following three tables.

Table-1: Every Day Differs. Fuel consumption remains a consistent percentage of current GW; thus, GW is ever decreasing due to fuel burn. TE uses an exponential method {(1-Δt)t}to model daily fuel requirements.

Table-2: Any day: 86,400 Unique Seconds TE arbitrarily chooses Day 20 as an example; Day 20's fuel requirement is 222.91 mTs of water. Simple division approximates an average burn rate of .00258 mT (= 2,580 grams) per second.

Table-3: Pulse requirements During each second, PA will create and expend many plasma packets.  Each will contain small quantity of water but a large number of particles. TE arbitrarily assumes a Packet Repetition Frequency (PRF) of 10,000 per second.

Table-1: Everyday is different.
t
GWt
Ft
fft-sec
Δt
days
metric Tonnes
mT/day
daily ave
gm/sec
daily ave
difference
0
100,000 mT 
n/a
n/a
n/a
1
99,767 mT
233.00
2,697 gm/sec
n/a
2
99,530 mT
232.46
2,690 gm/sec
 6.90 gm/sec
...
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
19
95,664 mT
223.45
2,586 gm/sec
 6.044 gm/sec
20
95,442 mT
222.91
2,580 gm/sec
 6.027 gm/sec
21
95,219 mT
222.39
2,574 gm/sec
 6.010 gm/sec
...
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
39
91,304 mT
213.24
2,468 gm/sec
5.76 gm/sec
40
91,091 mT
212.74
2,462 gm/sec
5.75 gm/sec
Given
%GWt*TOGW
GWt-1Day
Ft
86,400 s/d
fft-1 - fft
Δt= 0.233% / day 
  %GWt = (1-ΔDay)t

TOGW = GW0= 100,000 mT
TE work concludes that a vessel could maintain g-force acceleration if
--exhaust particles achieve .866c
--daily fuel consumption is .233% of its gross weight. 

Table 1 arbitrarily assumes ship's initial gross weight (GW0) to be 100,000 mTs.  With fuel consumption of .233%/day, ship will consume 233 mT of water during day 1, and ship's gross weight will decrease by 233 mTs.
GW1 = 99,767 mT
Day 2's fuel consumption will be .233% of 99,767 mT which further decreases ship's gross weight and so on.  Subsequent calculations (expedite with exponentials) eventually lead to fuel consumptions shown on Table 1 rows for mid-flight: days 19, 20, and 21. Since a metric Tonne (mT) equals 1,000,000 grams (gm), and one day equals 86,400 seconds, we can easily compute a daily per second average as shown in Table-1a.
Table-1a:
Daily Per Second Average
t
Ft
fft-sec
fft-sec=
Ft
86,400 s/d
day
grams/day
ave gm/s
19
223,454,000
2,586.27
20
222,912,000
2,580.00
21
222,385,000
2,573.09
*************
Total fuel requirement

for a 40 day, g-force mission is about 9,000 mTs of water.

(NOTE:  One Olympic sized swimming pool contains about 3,000 mTs of water.)
*************
Assume each day's "average value" occurs exactly at midday.
Table-1b. Three Days of Mid-Flight
t
sec
fft-sec
Δt
day of
flight
precise second
 at mid-day
assume fuel flow
at precise sec
difference
19
43,200thsec
2,586.03gm/sec
Δ19=+6.028gms
20
43,200thsec
2,580.00gm/sec
Δ20=0.000 gms
21
43,200thsec
2,573.99gm/sec
Δ21=- 6.010gms
Arbitrarily select Day 20 as a reference;
set Δ20 to zero. 
Thus, burn rate for previous day (19) is a little greater (+),
and burn rate for following day (21) is a little less (-).
Since vessel's GW and fuel burn rate gradually decrease throughout each day, common sense compels us to conclude the per second burn rate will range from slightly above the daily average to slightly below. TE artificially assumes each day's average per second fuel consumption value to be the "exact" value for the 43,200th second of the day (exactly halfway through the day's 86,400 seconds).

This midday value will differ between succeeding middays and can be readily discerned.  For example, Table-1b shows the19th midday value to be 6.028 grams greater then value for 20th midday. In turn, the 21st midday value decreases by 6.01 grams.


The name "Avogadro's Number" (NA) is an honorary name attached to the calculated value of the number of atoms, molecules, etc. in a gram molecular weight of any chemical substance.

To determine number of particles in a given mass, use Avagadro's Number (N) approximately 6.0221415×1023.   NA denotes quantity of molecules in one mole, material's atomic weight in grams.  A standard mole is defined as the value of quantity of atoms in 12 grams of pure carbon-12 (12C), carbon's primary isotope with atomic weight, 12.

Any substance's mean molecular weight expressed in grams has same number of molecules. For example, the mean molecular weight of natural water is about 18.015; so, one mole of water is about 18.015 grams  with 6.0221415×1023 molecules, same quantity as 12 grams (one mole) of Carbon-12.

The mole proves to be a convenient way for chemists to express the amounts of reagents and products of chemical reactions.
For example, the chemical equation:
2 H2+ O2 → 2 H2O
states that 2 mol of dihydrogen and 1 mol of dioxygen react to form 2 mols of water.

Divide a mole by water's molecular weight  to determine quantity of molecules in  one gram of water.
Water: 1 gm  = 6.0221415×1023  molecules / 18.015
1 gm = 0.334285×1023 molecules (of H2O)
If one gram of liquid water displaces one cubic centimeter (cc = cm3); then,
33.428×1021 water molecules Rel. 1 cm3
Cube root both sides of this relation; then, TE presumes 3.2213×107 molecules (of liquid water) take up 1 cm in length. Thus, average distance between liquid water molecules could be about:
10-2 meter / 3.2213×107 = 3.1×10-10 m = .31 nanometers.
Focus on Day 20
To more closely approximate per second fuel flows for Day 20,
use different Δs for first and second half of the day.
Table-1c. Day 20: Start to Finish
t
sec
fft-sec
Δt-sec
day_of
flight
precise
second
assume fuel flow
at precise sec
difference
20
00,001stsec
2,583.014gm/sec
Δ20AM=+3.014 gms
20
43,200thsec
2,580.000gm/sec
Δ20Mid=0.000 gms
20
86,400thsec
2,576.995gm/sec
Δ20PM=-3.005 gms
Determine morning  Δ  by halving previous's day's difference.
 Δ20AM = Δ19 ÷ 2=+3.014 gms
Determine afternoon Δ  by halving following day's difference.
Δ20PM = Δ21 ÷ 2 =-3.005 gms

For convenience, TE assumes linearity for determining precise and unique fuel consumption values for each of the 43,200 seconds in each half day.  A linear model requires a per second decrement (let i represent quantity of elapsed seconds):
ffi= FFDay - i*Δ
Decrement (Δ) can be expressed as mass or as quantity of potential particles (molecules not yet ionized).

At exactly midday of Day 20, 43,200th sec, vessel consumes 2,580 grams or 862.4549×1023 water molecules.

12 hours earlier, Day 20, first sec; fuel consumption is 3.014 grams more; 3.014 gms of water contain 1.007 534 99×1023  molecules.  To determine per second decrement, divide by 43,200.
Δ = -2.332 257×1018  = -.000 023 253×1023 

12 hours later, Day 20, 86,400th sec; fuel consumption is 3.005 grams less; 3.005 gms of water contain 1.004 524 92×1023  molecules.  To determine per second decrement, divide by 43,200.
Δ = -2.325 289×1018  = -.000 023 253×1023


Table-2. Day 20: 86,400 Unique Seconds.
t
ffsec
Nsec
Remarks
sec
estimated
grams
estimated
H2O molecules
1 gram of H2O contains 0.334 284 5×1023  molecules (or equivalent)
1
2,583.015 gm
 863.461 878×1023
First half day:
3.015 grams of H2O contain 1.007 868 81×1023  molecules (or equivalent)
Determine average decrement per second, divide by 43,200.
Δsec = .000 023 33×1023  molecules
2
≈ same
 863.461 854×1023
...
Δ << 1 gm
Δ≈.000 023 33×1023
43,199
≈ same
862.454 033×1023
Δsec= +.000 023 33×1023 
43,200
2,580.000 gm
862.454 010×1023
Reference Point: Exact Midday: Δ= 0.0
43,201
≈ same
 862.453 987×1023
Δsec= -.000 023 25×1023 
...
Δ << 1 gm
Δ≈ 000 023 25×1023
Second half day:
3.005 grams of H2O contain 1.004 524 92×1023  molecules (or equivalent)
Determine average decrement per second, divide by 43,200.
Δsec = .000 023 25×1023  molecules
86,399
≈ same
861.449 508×1023
86,400
2,576.995 gm
861.449 485×1023
Given
Ft
86,400 s/d
NA*ffsec
mole
Assume day 20 of 40 day voyage.
Fuel consumption is 222.91 mT for average fuel flow of  2,580 gm/sec

*************
Avogadro, the Method
In 1811, Avogadro first proposed his hypotheis: volume of a gas (at a given pressure and temperature) is proportional to the number of atoms or molecules regardless of the nature of the gas.

The term "Avogadro Number" was first used in a 1909 paper by Jean Baptiste Jean Perrin (1870-1942) entitled "Brownian Movement and Molecular Reality." (Translated from French to English  in "Annales De Chimie et de Physique" by Fredric Soddy.)


In 1909, French physicist, Jean Perrin, proposed naming the constant in honor of Avogadro.
Perrin: "The invariable number N is a universal constant, which may be appropriately designated 'Avogadro's Constant'." (now known as NA)

Perrin, won the 1926 Nobel Laureate in Physics for his work on the discontinuous structure of matter and the discovery of sedimentation equilibrium. A large part of his work determined the Avogadro constant by several different methods.

Determinating Avogadro's number required accurate and precise measurement of a single quantity on both the atomic and macroscopic scales.
In 1834, Michael Faraday's works on electrolysis contained value for electrical charge of a mole of electrons ("Faraday constant").
In 1910, Robert Millikan, an American physicist,  measured the charge on a single electron.  Divide the charge on a mole of electrons by the charge of a single electron to determine Avogadro's number.  Since 1910, newer methods  more accurately determined the values for Faraday's constant, the elementary charge, and NA.
Thus far, TE has considered various water quantities required to g-force propel 100,000 mT vessel:
  • For the entire trip, the 40 day requirement is about 10,000 metric Tonnes, enough water to fill a large pond or a small lake.
  • For one day, the daily requirement will be about 250 mTs, a small swimming pool.
  • Each day has 86,400 seconds. For each second, fuel consumption is a few liters, typical daily ration for drinking, cooking, etc.
  • During each second, PA could eject 10,000 particle packets. Each packet could contain about a quarter gram of ionized water (1/4 gram liquid water is about 5 raindrops).
If the Packet Repetition Frequency (PRF) is 10,000 per second, the associated Period, P, is 100 µseconds.  Thus, each packet has a 100 µsec window.  If the particles travel at .866c (259,620,268 meters/sec), PRF's associated wavelength is about 26,000 m.  Thus, a packet could travel 26 km in one packet period, more then sufficient to travel TE's projected PA guidepath of one km.

Lay literature states the PA particle beam is "pencil thin".  Thus, TE arbitrarily assumes a circular cross section with max radius of one millimeter.

TE further assumes following packet dimensions:
A= π r2 = 3.14 (.1 cm)2   = .0314 cm2

  L = 10 m = 10 × 100 cm = 1,000 cm

V = A × L = .0314 cm2 × 1,000 cm  = 31.4 cm3

Since 30 cubic centimeters (cc) can contain
30 grams of liquid water,   
TE assumes 31.4 cc is enough
volume for one quarter gram of water ions.
TE assumes onboard PA uses "storage tubes" where particles will orbit at .866c for lengthy periods before being diverted into exhaust tube, final 1 km "guidepath" just prior to exit from spacecraft. This assumption justifies constant speed considerations reflected in diagram below.  However, 25 extra kilometers leaves plenty of margin for adjustment.  For example, if particles had to accelerate from zero to .866c within one km guidepath, this would reduce the average speed to .433 c, enough velocity to travel 13 km during the 100 µsec period; 12 km to spare.

Divide each second into 10,000 equal periods.
 During each 100 µsec period, allocate one packet.
For each each 100 µsec period, the packet occupies the one km guidepath for only 4 µsecs; plenty of time to prepare for next packet.
At only one FLoating OPeration (FLOP) per nanosecond, each period has enough time for 100,000 FLOPs; TE assumes this to be sufficient computing power to make needed minor adjustments per packet.

Due to repulsion of like charged particles, plasma particles naturally tend to spread out into available volume.  However,TE assumes that well designed PA uses superconducting magnets (sextupoles and quadrapoles) to focus each packet both longitudially and radially.
0
.008×1021
0.181×1021
1.17×1021
2.94×1021
2.94×1021
1.17×1021
0.181×1021
.008×1021
0
<<.001NP
.001NP
.021NP
.136NP
.341NP
.341NP
.136NP
.021NP
.001NP
<<.001NP
 NP = 8.624 540 100×1021 water molecules (ionized into particles)
Longitudinal cross section shows particle density throughout the total packet length (10 meters).  TE assumes normal distribution of particles throughout the 10m length; this results in a elongated bell curve with highest density at the mean (μ) length (5m) from start of packet. For convenience, TE assumes standard deviation (σ) of one meter; thus, 68.2% of particles are within one meter of μ; 95.4% of particles are within 2 meters of μ; and so on.
Radial cross sections at various lengths along packet show particles filling up circular areas at various radii from the center. Radial focusing moves particles toward packet's center line. Particle density is greatest at the mean length of the packet, but particle density decreases as packet length differs from the mean. Thus, the lesser particle quantity is more affected by the magnetic radial focus which drives them closer to packet center line.
As described above, TE assumes a packet length of 10 m (packet volume > 30 cc) can easily contain .25 gms of water ions (recall 1 gm of liquid water is about 1 cubic cm). However, this model leaves plenty of margin for adjustment, and the packet length can easily be increased as required. Other adjustable parameters include: PRF, packet size, guidepath length, cross sectional radius and no doubt others.

Table-3a:Every day differs.
t
fft-sec
Pgm
Ppar
days
daily ave
gm/sec
ave gram
per pkt
ave particles
per pkt
1
 2,697 gm/sec
.270 gm
9.026×1021
...
. . .
. . .
. . .
20
 2,580 gm/sec
.258 gm
8.624×1021
...
. . .
. . .
. . .
40
 2,462 gm/sec
.246 gm
8.223×1021
Given
See Tables
1 & 2.
fft-sec

PRF
K * Pgm
PRF= 10,000 packets per second Conversion Factor: K = 33.428×1021
(Qty of water molecules/gm)
From Tables One and Two, determine average fuel flow per second for any day during the voyage.  TE arbitrarily shows values for first, mid and last days of the 40 day trip.

For each day's 86,400 seconds, TE assumes a range of 86,400 decreasing, unique values. Thus, fuel flow values will range from slightly above average to slightly below. TE assumes each day's average fuel flow is the precise fuel flow for the 43,200th second of that day (precise midday).

For each precise midday, TE takes assumed value and determines average packet size by dividing by PRF (assume: 10,000 packets per second).  Like values for seconds of the day, values for packets of the second will range from slightly above to slightly below.

TE assumes: At the precise midsecond, the 5,000th packet contains precisely that second's average particles per packet.
Avogadro, the Man
*************
Amedeo Carlo Avogadro was born in Turin in 1776 to a noble family of Piedmont, Italy. He dedicated himself to physics and mathematics (then called positive philosophy).  In 1809, he started teaching at a liceo (high school) in Vercelli, where his family had property.

In 1811, he published an article ("...Determining the Relative Masses of the Elementary Molecules of Bodies and the Proportions by Which They Enter These Combinations"), in a French journal, (Journal of Physics, Chemistry and Natural History); so, his major work "Avogadro's Hypothesis" was first written in French, even though Avogadro was Italian.

In 1820, he became Professor of Physics at the University of Turin.  Due to regional politics, he lost his chair during 1823; however,  Avogadro was recalled to the university in Turin in 1833, and he taught for another twenty years.

Though active in politics in younger life, Avogadro's private life was mostly sober and religious. He married Felicita Mazzé and had six children.

Professionally, Avogadro was very active; he held posts dealing with statistics, meteorology, and weights and measures (he introduced the metric system into Piedmont) and was a member of the Royal Superior Council on Public Instruction.

TE uses different forms of Scientific Notation: a×10b (operand, a, times power of ten)
Form
TE ExampleWhy this form?
Normalized 
 1 ≤ a < 10
1 mole = 6.0221415×1023 molecules
This normalized SN value is the the textbook definition of the mole, standard number of molecules in atomic weight (in grams) regardless of substance.
Non-normalized 
 a < 1
1 gm (of  H2O)=1 mole/18.015 
0.334285×1023 molecules
Non-normalized value of water particles per gram readily compares with above value of particles per mole by keeping same value for exponent.
Non-normalized  
a  > 1
typical ffsec = 2,580 gm (of  ionized H2O)/sec
= 862.454 010×1023 equivalent molecules/sec
Non-normalized value of ionized water particles per second readily compares with above values of particles per mole and particles per  gram.
Change to Normalized
862.454010×1023=8.62454010×1025 
Equivalent value of particles per second can be expressed in Normalized SN by
--decrease magnitude of operand (move decimal point left 2 digits)
--increase power of  10 (add 2 to exponent)
Reduce Magnitude
8.624 540 10×1021 particles per packet
At 10,000 packets per second, approximate particles per packet by dividing by 104. Due to nature of exponents, this is done by simply subtracting 4 from 25.
Engineering Notation
10b;  b is mult, of 3
33.428×1021 molecules
 (of liquid water) 
displace 1 cm3 in volume
Returning to quantity of H2O molecules in one gram, TE chooses to change from Scientific Notation (SN) to Engineering Notation (EN).
 3.3428×1022 = 33.428×1021 
Cube Root
 3.2213×107 molecules
(of liquid water) 
take up 1 cm  in length
Cube root volume to find cube's edge length in both cm and molecules.  Cube root readily done when power of ten is multiple of 3.
(33.428×1021)1/3  = 3.2213×107
Negative Exponents
Intermolecular  Distance = 3.1×10-10 m1 cm = 10-2  m
10-2  m/ 3.2213×107 = 3.1×10-10 = .31 nanometers.
Table-3b. Mid-day 20 of G-force Flight
For each second of powered flight, average particles per packet is readily computed as shown in Table 2. TE assumes this value to also be actual value of packet which transits the guidepath during precise midsecond (500,000 µsec shown below as decimal ".500").  
t
NP
Δsec
Δpkt
Decimal
Seconds
Ave Particles
per Packet
Per Second Diff
Particles/Second
Per Packet Diff
Particles/Packet
43,199.500 sec
8.624 540 33×1021
Δsec= +2.333×1015 
Δpkt= +2.333×1011 
43,200.500 sec
8.624 540 10×1021
Reference: Δsec= 0.0
Reference: Δpkt= 0.0
43,201.500 sec
8.624 539 87×1021
Δsec= -2.325×1015 
 Δpkt= -2.325×1011 
 Mid-day
Δsec / 104
Consider three seconds at the exact middle of 20th day of powered flight (41,199; 42,000; 42,001).  Let exact middle of 42,000th second be the reference; then, compare values with one second before reference (midpoint of 41,199s) and with one second after reference point (midpoint of 42,001s).
Table-3c. Precise Middle Second of Day 20
First half second is slightly greater. First Half Second: packet size decreases by 1.1665×1015  particles..
Determine per packet decrement (divide by 5,000)
Δpkt = Δ / 5,000 = 2.333×1011  particles/packet
P
TimingNP
Remarks
Packet
µsec
µsec
Particles
per Packet
Semi-Second Diff in
Particles/Packet
0001
000,001
000,100
8.624 540 22×1021
Δ = +1.1665×1015 
5,000
499,901
500,000
8.624 540 10×1021
Reference: Δ= 0.0
10,000
999,901
1,000,000
 8.624 539 98×1021
Δ = -1.1625×1015 
 Mid-day
Packet's
first µsec
Packet's
last µsec
See Table-2
See Table-2
Last half second: Δpkt = 1.1625×1015/5,000 = 2.325×1011  particles/packet
Let exact middle of 42,000th second be the reference; then, compare values with 1/2 second before reference (start of 43,200s) and with 1/2 second after reference (end of 43,200s).


Table-3. 10,000 Unique Values for 10,000 Packets.
Particle Quantity: First to Last Packet of Second 43,200
P
t
ffP
NP
Remarks
Packet
µsec
estimated
grams
estimated
H2O molecules
1
1-100
.2583 gm
8.624 540 220 0000×1021
First half second:
First to Mid: packet size decreases by 1.1665×1015  particles.
Divide by 5,000 for per packet decrement:  2.333×1011  part.
2
101-200
≈ same
8.624 540 219 7667×1021
...
...
...
...
4,999
499,801-499,900
≈ same
8.624 540 100 2333×1021
 Δpkt = .000 000 000 2333×1021  molecules
5,000
499,901-500,000
.2580 gm
8.624 540 100 0000×1021
Reference Point: Exact Midday: Δ= 0.0
5,001
500,001-500,100
≈ same
8.624 540 099 7675×1021
 Δpkt = .000 000 000 2325×1021  molecules
...
...
...
...
Second half second:
Mid to Last: packet size decreases by 1.1625×1015  particles.
Divide by 5,000 for per packet decrement:  2.325×1011  part.
9,999
999,801-999,900
≈ same
8.624 539 980 2325×1021
10,000
999,901-1,000,000
.2577 gm
8.624 539 980 0000×1021
Given
1 packet passes through the PA every 100 µsec,
 10,000 packets per second.
NA*ffsec
mole
Assume day 20 of 40 day voyage.
Fuel consumption is 222.91 mT for average fuel flow of  2,580 gm/sec

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS  
Plasma Source. To continuously generate plasma, TE assumes significant PA design such that significant portion of particle stream diverts to impact a designated "pool" of water. At near light speed, this particle impact would impart sufficient energy to "superheat" the solid/liquid water and ionize the water molecules.

Real Efficiency. Hence, one of the many reasons for particle stream inefficiencies or less then100% conversion of plasma ions to propulsion particles. Thus, Thought Experiment arbitrarily assumed an efficiency of 70%; thus, best case scenario 30% of PA particles diverted to superheat water and create more plasma ions for more PA cycles.

Model Adjustments. Very likely that not all consumed fuel will exit (due to inherent inefficiencies); however, if some particles are put to other uses other then propulsion (whether by design or defect) can those consumed particles correctly be modeled as GW decrement.  Smarter modelers will improve TE's current model; however, real data from actual flights will have the final word.

Particle Flow Precision. Finally, is it necessary or even possible to adjust particle quantities for individual packets??? Table 3 (above) approximates a theoretical per packet decrement of .23 parts per billion for subsequent packets.  Even with greatly enhanced future technology, that sounds impractical if not impossible.  A more practical method might be distribute weight scales throughout the vessel; these weight sensors could stream data into a centralized systems of servos/computers/etc to constantly make practical adjustments to PA's plasma flow.  The objective: keep vessel's acceleration very close to g-force as perceived by humans.

Afterthought!

At 5 drops per packet of particles;

 fuel flow is about 50,000 drops per second.

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Superconducting Magnets

TE's onboard particle accelerator use different types of magnets (dipole, quadrapole, sextupole).
All these types must be the most power efficient magnets possible; they must superconduct.

Particle accelerators use many electromagnets to produce required magnetic fields.

Typical synchrotron has many complex, powerful electromagnets, each magnet has perhaps a kilometer of electrical cable; each cable has hundreds of millimeter diameter wires. Ordinary electromagnets (e.g, "resistive" magnets) would require enormous power for such windings. Fortunately, superconducting wires require lots less power.

Tradeoff: production of superconducting magnets is a sophisticated process with considerable effort to design, manufacture and assemble.

A very simple electromagnet could be a wire wound nail (see diagram) and a connection to an electrical source (i.e., battery).

A typical electromagnet is much more complex then a few turns of wire connected to a battery.  It  contains many windings of electrical conductors such as filaments, wires and cables.

A superconducting electromagnet is even more complex and is described in detail below.

Magnetic Fields focus and steer the particle beams. Different  magnet configurations accomplish different functions. 
Dipole magnets steer the beams, a basic and necessary function. Orbits are by definition cyclic and near circular, and the beams must be "steered" for millions of orbits.Quadrupole magnets focus the beams radially. Groups of accelerated, charged particles tend to expand over time due to the initial random motion of the particles and the natural repulsion between like charges. The spread will increase until particles hit the wall of the vacuum chamber and are lost; thus, storage rings use quadrupoles to save particles and infrastructure. 


Problem: Laws of electromagnetism (Maxwell equations) show that it is impossible for a single quadrupole to simultaneously focus both vertically and horizontally.
Solution: In a particle accelerator, the various magnets required to bend, steer and correct the particle beam make up 'the lattice'.Quadrupoles have two configurations:
-----F quadrupoles focus horizontally.
-----D quadrupoles focus vertically.
F and D quadrupoles alternate throughout the accelerator with carefully designed spaces between them.
Tightly bunched particles naturally tend to spread. Fortunately, they will experience a horizontal force towards the center when they pass through the F magnet as well as a vertical force towards the center when they pass through the D magnets. The overall effect focuses the particle beam in both horizontal and vertical planes (see "strong-focusing"). This F-D lattice enables beam transport over long distances.

Sextupole magnets synchronize separate particle collections by controlling longitudinal spread. As dipole and quadrupole magnets more strongly affect lower energy particles, any energy spread in the bunch will start to increase the bunch's length.

Superconductivity occurs in certain materials generally at very low temperatures, characterized by zero electrical resistance. The resistance of a superconductor drops abruptly to zero when the material is cooled below its "critical temperature". An electric current flowing in a loop of superconducting wire can persist indefinitely with no power source. Superconductivity occurs in a wide variety of materials, including simple elements like tin, aluminium, and copper; various metallic alloys and some heavily-doped semiconductors. Superconductivity does not occur in noble metals like gold and silver, nor in pure samples of ferromagnetic metals .
For current technology, superconducting magnets have proved essential for particle acclerators; this will be even more true for space based accelerators with limited resources.  To briefly discuss, we first cover the basics (conductivity, then superconducitivity, then superconducting magnets...)


Brief History of Superconductors
1911
H. K. Onnes discovers superconductivity near absolute zero (4°K). (Nobel Prize 1913).
1951
Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer propose superconductivity theory. (Nobel Prize 1972)
1986
IBM researchers, Georg Bednorz and Alex Mueller, discover certain ceramics superconduct at 35°K (-238°C).
1987
Paul Chu, University of Houston, achieves superconductivity in liquid nitrogen at 91°K (-182°C). High Temperature Superconduction (HTS) is born.
Basic Conductivity: Electron Drift
Atom is basic component of matter; it has a nucleus with internal protons; it also has same number of electrons which orbit the nucleus. Smallest atoms have only one orbit with one or two electrons.  However, many atoms are larger with many electrons arranged in multiple orbits (i.e. "shells"). Hydrogen has a single electron in one orbit, while uranium has 92 electrons across seven shells.

Copper Atom
Basic Valence Theory. Given shells can accomodate different quantities of electrons. Two electrons is tops for the first orbit, and eight electrons is the max for the second shell. For example, a copper atom has a total of 29 electrons in four shells:
  • two (the maximum) in the first shell
  • eight (the maximum) in the second shell
  • eighteen (max) in third shell
  • remainder – 1 – in its fourth and outermost shell 

 Copper atom's outermost shell could fit at least seven more electrons. When considering electricity, the atom's most important shell is the outermost (valence) shell.

Valence electrons can travel from atom to atom which results in electricity. During the conduction process, an electron leaves one host and quickly joins another.  Materials with these kinds of atoms are conductors. That’s the case with our aluminum atom (and metals in general). One or more of its three free electrons might decide to wander off; likewise, the valence shell has room to accommodate visitors.


PHYSICS FACTOID:
Electrons are much smaller then protons
which are almost 2,000 times larger.
mp = 1,836 * me
Some inherently stable materials (wood is an example) are insulators.  Valence theory tells us insulators tend to not accommodate lone electrons because their outermost orbit is full; on the other hand, conductors can accommodate traveling electrons.


PHYSICS FACTOID: In an electrical current,
free electrons travel along the surface of a wire
and repel each other as they move toward a
positive charge of an available nucleus.
This is the “skin effect.
Electron Hopping. In a copper wire, valence electrons migrate back and forth from one atom to the next. If you connect one end of the wire to a battery's anode (positive terminal), and the other end to the cathode (negative terminal), free electrons in your aluminum will move all in the same direction. This creates a circuit of streaming electrons, electricity, to fuel your radio or flashlight.


FACTOID: In 1848, William Thomson (aka Lord Kelvin) invented the Kelvin Scale to measure the extremely cold temperatures. Kelvin developed the idea of absolute temperature which places absolute zero at -273° C (-460° F). Kelvin scale places it at 0 Kelvin (0° K). Water freezes at  273° K (0° C).
Electrical resistance comes from electrons bumping into non-receptive atoms (or other free electrons). This causes heat, and electric wires would be slightly warm to the touch if they weren’t insulated. While heat is sometimes an useful byproduct of electricity (in electric blankets or stoves); it often is not.

FACT: Not all substances can superconduct. From the periodic table, 57 elements are known (as of May 2009) to superconduct. However, some elements only superconduct under high pressure or in modified forms, such as thin films or nanotubes.
Father of Superconductivity In 1911, Dutch physicist, Heike Kamerlingh Onnes, discovered that  a metal, mercury, lost all electrical resistance in extreme cold, and electrons flowed freely. To achieve super cold conditions, Dr. Onnes first liquified helium at 4° K.

Due to Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation from the Big Bang, most of deep space is a few degrees above absolute zero, about 3° K. However, scientists have achieved temperatures well within one degree above absolute zero in laboratories.
TE's spaceship will have much better access to 3° K environment; thus, superconducting materials will be easier to cool then similiar materials on Earth's surface.
How Does Superconducting Work? In 1957, three researchers  (John Bardeen, Leon Cooper and Robert Schrieffer) hypothesized that superconducting electrons actually attract each other (this eventually led to their Nobel Prize in 1972).
BACKGROUND: When metals are in their solid state, their atoms have a crystal lattice structure. Near absolute zero, these extremely cold metal atoms are barely moving. The Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) Theory states that super cold metal's electrons pair upelectronic fluid cannot be resolved into individual electrons. Instead, it consists of bound pairs of electrons known as Cooper pairs. These zip through the static lattice with great efficiency to form a very fluid stream; thus, superconduction.

Nitrogen is all around us. While oxygen gives us life, nitrogen makes up more than two-thirds of ambient air; the stuff we breathe into our lungs.
High-Temperature Superconductivity Scientists have long pursued superconductivity at higher temperatures. If mercury superconducts at 4° K, other metals or alloys might superconduct at slightly warmer temperatures. The goal quickly became to create superconductivity at 77° K. While still frigid, that temperature could be achieved by liquid nitrogen, considerably cheaper and easier to work with than liquid helium. Nitrogen is certainly more readily available than Helium.

Diamagnetism happends when a superconducting material excludes the magnetic force of another magnet and forces it to "float". It is formally known as the Meissner-Ochsenfeld Effect, after the two Germans, Walther Meissner and Robert Ochsenfeld, who discovered it in 1933. 
In 1986, a pair of IBM scientists came closer to this goal; they achieved superconductivity at about 30° K with a ceramic oxide. In 1987, Paul Chu achieved superconductivity with liquid nitrogen at 91° K, and a new field of research was born: high-temperature superconductivity.
Today, scientists continue to push the envelope. As of 2006, the record of 138°K, achieved in 1994, was still standing. Scientists have actually achieved superconductivity at temperatures as warm as 164° K, but only under high pressure.

Superconducting Disruptors:
Heat and Magnetism
--Superconductors become normal conductors above the temperature threshold for a given material.
--In similar manner, superconductors also revert back to normal conductors above a certain magnetic threshold.
Critical Magnetic Field can disrupt a material’s superconductivity. Recall the Meissner Effect: a superconductor can expel an outside magnetic force. The reverse is also true; a sufficiently high magnetic force can change a superconductor back to a normal conductor. The strength of the magnetic field required to break the material’s superconductivity is that material's critical field.

Superconductor Types
•Type 1: “Soft”superconductors contain just one element (Examples: mercury or copper).
•Type 2: “Hard” superconductors contain multiple elements (i.e. compounds and often alloys). Also, high-temperature superconductors (HTS) are Type 2.
However, Type 1 and Type 2 superconductors react differently to critical magnetic fields.
Superconductors revert to normal conductivity in the presence of a critical magnetic field; however, Type 1 does it differently then Type 2.  Type 1 superconductor operation is straight forward. Consider the element, mercury, which superconducts at 4.2° K. However, expose it to a magnetic field of .041 tesla or higher, and superconductivity stops; Cooper pairs break up, and mercury conductivity immediately reverts to normal.

Type 2 superconductors have a magnetic critical field with a lower and upper thresholds. Consider niobium-tin (Nb3Sn), a compound which superconducts at 18° K; it is commonly used in the superconducting magnets of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machines. Below a magnetic field of 0.01 tesla, Nb3Sn fully superconducts. Above 29 tesla, superconducting ceases entirely. Between these two threshold values (0.01 to 29 tesla), the material is in a "mixed state"; part of it conducts electricity normally, other part superconducts.

In this mixed state, the superconducting material no longer fully excludes the outside magnetic field; as the field strength increases and approaches the upper critical field, the more the field penetrates the superconductor. The closer to the upper critical field you get, the less superconducting the material becomes. Type 2 superconductors generally can sustain superconductivity in the presence of much higher magnetic fields then Type 1. Thus, high performance magnets are Type 2 superconductors.
  





Making Superconducting Magnets

Electromagnets use electron flow to generate magnetic fields. Traditional electromagnets (resistive magnets) use considerable electricity to generate their high magnetic fields. However, a superconducting magnet creates very high magnetic fields with much less energy.
Resistive magnets stack metal Bitter plates into a coil. In contrast, superconducting magnets use hundreds of wires: wires are twisted into cables; cables are inserted into tubes; then, tubes are wound into a coil.

Superconductor Advantages
  • Cost: Superconductor magnet costs about 1% of a similar capacity resistive magnet. This is true even when one factors in expensive cryogens (i.e., liquid helium and liquid nitrogen).
  • Performance: Stable and more uniform magnetic fields. Less stable electricity (i.e., commercial sources) cause magnetic fields to fluctuate. 
  • Footprint: Superconducting magnets are also more compact and efficient. There is more current (i.e., amperage) per unit of space.
  • Reliability: Superconducting magnets generally last longer. Resistive magnets endure considerable heat-induced wear and tear; not a problem for supercool superconductors.
Superconductor Disadvantages
  • Complexity: They are more complicated than resistive magnets (a column of stacked metal discs); thus, more money/time to develop and manufacture.
  • Critical Field: Superconducting materials are limited by a critical field; above this magnetic field strength, they can no longer superconduct. Thus, magnetic fields of the most powerful superconducting magnets are bested by the fields of most powerful resistive magnets.
Material Differences
Low-temperature superconducting magnets use liquid helium (about 4°K) to keep cool. Materials  could be niobium-tin (Nb3Sn) or niobium-titanium (NbTi). Niobium-titanium is cheaper and less fragile, but niobium-tin produces a higher magnetic field. Often, same superconducting magnet will use both materials.
High-temperature superconductors (HTS) can superconduct at the higher temperature of liquid nitrogen (about 77°K). HTS materials include YBCO (yttrium barium copper oxide) and BSCCO (bismuth strontium calcium copper oxide).
Today, most superconducting magnets are low temperature and use Niobium based alloys.
TE notes: In space, how available are these elements (niobium, tin, titanium )? Can other more available elements (i.e., aluminum) be made to work adequately if not optimally??
CICC Magnets contain over 1,000 meters of cables, and each cable contains several hundred wires. Each wire is about as thick as a paper clip wire and contains many filaments; each filaments is thinner than a human hair (micrometer-thin). Many tiny filaments greatly increases the total surface area to more quickly disperse heat from the magnet and stabilize the magnetic field.

In a multi-stage process, these filaments are embedded in copper to make a wire less than 1 mm in diameter. Thousands of filaments are twisted into wires, and hundreds of wires combine to create a thumb sized cable. Each kilometer of cable contains about 157 km of  twisted wire.

A copper matrix stabilizes the superconducting material. If a temperature spike interupts superconductor current flow, the copper will carry the current in resistive mode and divert the heat. This matrix protects from sudden overheating which could possible damage and/or destroy this valuable equipment.


Steps to Produce CICC Magnet Cable
1. Jacket cable inside a round stainless steel or other alloy tube.
2. Shape it into a rectangular cross-section (to compact even more).
3. Bombard the cable with sound waves to completely sanitize.
4. Wrap the cable with two layers of fiberglass tape for insulation and structure.
5. Wind cable onto a form, like thread on a spool.
6. Bake in a customized furnace at 700° C for about 10 days.
In the final product, CICC wires are packed very tightly; however, liquid helium flows freely between them to ensure low-temperature environment required for superconductivity.

PROBLEM: Weld Joints.
A superconducting magnet contains over a kilometer of cable with hundreds of kms of twisted wire inside the cable. For one continuous conductor, wire segments must be welded together. The electrical current will encounter some resistance (and generate heat) at those weld joints; thus, such resistance must be minimized.
Solid State Diffusion: Step 6 creates the superconducting niobium-tin alloy. Prior to heating, the wire contains two kinds of filaments: niobium and tin. At 700° C, the tin melts and diffuses into the niobium for an alloy which superconducts at near absolute zero. 
Epoxy Treatment. Finally, coil requires an epoxy shell. Inject expoxy into the coil; then, coil sets for several days in a warm impregnation chamber. This hardening process forms a shell around the coil much like the fiberglass epoxy composites in boats or Corvettes. Finally, the excess epoxy is painstakingly removed, and the magnet is ready to test.

Wire-Wound Magnets: Uniform Fields WW magnets start out with the same materials as cable-in-conduit conducting (CICC) magnets: niobium-tin and niobium-titanium. Like CICC magnets, WW magnets also use wires wound into coils.

WW magnet differs from CICC magnet in construction and use. For example, technicians install 100 layers of insulation around the WW magnet to maintain low temperature.To make a niobium-tin coil for a wire-wound magnet, use a bronze-processed conductor.
Steps to Produce WW Magnet Cable
1. Embed tens of thousands of niobium filaments in bronze (an alloy mixture of tin and copper).
2. Wrap wire core in either niobium or tantalum.
3. Jacketed wire in copper (the niobium/tantalum layer prevents the copper from interacting with the tin inside). The finished wire's diameter typically measures about 2 mm.
4. Braid glass insulation around the wire to form a sleeve which electrically isolates each turn of conductor.
5. Wind wire tightly on a stainless steel spool. This takes thousands of turns with wire wound in several layers.
6. Cook the coil in a very hot furnace. In the bronze matrix, tin reacts with the niobium filaments to create the superconducting niobium-tin.
7. Inject epoxy into the winding pack; discard excess and coil is finished.

Cool Contrasts
Wire-Wound (WW) superconducting magnets cool from the outside in, from the surface of the coil.
Cable-in-Conduit Cable (CICC) superconductors cool directly (and more efficiently), from the inside out.
Steps are reaccomplished to produce several more coils of varying diameter and stacked one inside the next.
For the final product, the whole WW magnet goes into a cryostat to keep the magnet cold enough to superconduct. This cryostat keeps the magnet cold from the outside. Cryostat uses vacuum, cryogenics (liquid helium and liquid nitrogen) with insulation to maintain a very low operating temperature.

CICC magnets are quick and agile; they produce strong magnetic fields very soon after they power up. Quick magnetic fields produce a lot of heat, but CICC's powerful coolants control the heat. When magnetic fields change intensity, they create electrical currents in adjacent conductors; with current comes heat. However, CICC magnets can handle this heat because the superconducting wires stay immersed in supercold liquid helium (4°K).

Since CICC magnets need electrical power,  alternating current's (AC) changing directions can cause irregularities in the magnetic field. "Field Homogeneity" is a measure of magnetic change.

In agile Cable-in-Conduit Cable (CICC)  magnets, such change is measured in parts per thousand.

In stable Wire-Wound (WW) magnets, field change is rare. It is measured in parts per million; sometimes, parts per billion.
In constrast, WW magnets can't handle the heat because their coolant is far from the superconducting wires. Thus, wire-wound magnets ramp up very slowly, over several hours, days or even weeks; anything faster would create too much heat.

However, WW magnets have an enormous advantage: they can maintain an uniform magnetic field with no outside power. After they eventually ramp up, they unplug from their power supply, but the superconducting current continues to run. For example, MagLab’s 900 MHz has been conducting electricity continuously, uplugged, since 2004! That smooth current makes a smooth, homogenous magnetic field that travels a precisely controlled path.
Exactly what space based particle accelerators need:
consistent magnetic fields with no power requirements!!!

Thus,  the quick, agile CICC magnets have a distinct disadvantage; they need power!!

A superconducting magnet uses coils of superconducting wire cooled to cryogenic temperatures during operation.

Advantages:
  • stronger magnetic fields than ordinary iron-core electromagnets
  • cheaper
  • no ohmic resistance in the windings.
Cooling
During operation, the magnet windings must stay below their critical temperature; the temperature at which the winding material changes from the normal resistive state and becomes a superconductor. Liquid helium is cools most superconductive windings, even those with critical temperatures far above its boiling point of 4.2° K. This is because the lower the temperature, the better superconductive windings work - the higher the currents and magnetic fields they can stand without returning to their non-superconductive state. The magnet and coolant are contained in a thermally insulated container (dewar) called a cryostat. To keep the helium from boiling away, the cryostat is usually constructed with an outer jacket containing (significantly cheaper) liquid nitrogen at 77° K.
One goal of the search for high temperature superconductors is to build magnets cooled only by liquid nitrogen. Above about 20° K, cooling can be achieved without boiling off cryogenic liquids.


Niobium was first used commercially in the early 20th century. Brazil is the leading producer of niobium and ferroniobium, an alloy of niobium and iron. Niobium is used mostly in alloys, the largest part in special steel such as that used in gas pipelines. Although alloys contain only a maximum of 0.1%, that small percentage of niobium improves the strength of the steel. Niobium is used in various superconducting materials. These superconducting alloys, also containing titanium and tin, are widely used in the superconducting magnets.

Superconducting magnets Niobium-superconducting alloys, Niobium-germanium (Nb3Ge), niobium-tin (Nb3Sn), as well as the niobium-titanium alloys are used as a type II superconductor wire for superconducting magnets. These are in particle accelerators. For example, the Large Hadron Collider uses 600 metric tons of superconducting strands, while the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor is estimated to use 600 metric tonnes of Nb3Sn strands and 250 metric tonnes of NbTi strands.

Thought Experiment assumes on board accelerators will use both.




Vast majority of these magnets will be WW for storage rings to maintain high speed particle beams for as long as needed; this could be several hours, days or sometimes even weeks.
TE assumes a few CICC "extractor" magnets. These will accommodate requirements for ever changing magnetic fields. Exhaust requirements must constantly change (since fuel consumption ever decreases the ship's mass). A few extractor magnets (e.g., "pulsed magnets") in a storage ring will carefully output a "bunch" of particles out of the ring. These use a high voltage modulator to produce magnetic fields with very fast rise and fall times to ensure the field is only present for the chosen particle bunch.